Dhruv Rathee’s recent review of the film “Animal” has ignited discussions on the portrayal of sensitive subjects in cinema. This controversial movie, known for its depiction of misogyny and toxic masculinity without redemption, has prompted Rathee to question its potential impact on society.
Comparisons with Impactful Films:
Rathee begins his critique by drawing parallels between “Animal” and other impactful films such as “The White Ribbon” and “Udaan.” This comparison serves as a backdrop for exploring how cinema handles delicate and socially relevant topics.
In his characteristic straightforward style, Rathee describes “Animal” as a “cringe fest” and goes on to assert that the film is detrimental to societal values. This candid expression sets the tone for the review, highlighting the serious concerns raised by the movie.
Insights from Tihar Jail Survey:
Rathee references Madhumita Pandey’s survey conducted among Tihar Jail prisoners, where she discovered varying degrees of regret among criminals. Notably, the lack of remorse among rapists becomes a focal point, shedding light on the film’s disturbing portrayal of characters.
Commonality Among Characters:
A crucial observation made by Rathee is the common thread linking characters in “Animal” who display power, anger, and sadism—they all perceive women as inferior. This analysis emphasizes the film’s potential contribution to harmful stereotypes.
Impact on Children:
Rathee delves into the potential impact of problematic movies on a child’s life, particularly in environments where negative influences are prevalent. This raises concerns about the long-term effects of exposure to such content.
Film’s Depiction and Redemption:
The heart of Rathee’s criticism lies in the film’s portrayal of misogyny and toxic masculinity without redemption. He likens it to a harmful sermon, emphasizing the absence of positive resolutions for the characters and story.
Negative Impact on Society:
The overarching concern highlighted by Rathee is that films like “Animal” contribute to a regressive atmosphere in society. By perpetuating harmful stereotypes without offering redemption, the movie is seen as potentially reinforcing detrimental societal views.
Rathee breaks down the review with timestamped segments, each addressing specific aspects of the film’s shortcomings. From poor handling of sensitive topics to the film’s impact on society and its potential influence on children, the summary provides a comprehensive overview of the critical points raised.
Dhruv Rathee’s honest and forthright review of “Animal” serves as a thought-provoking analysis of the film’s potential societal impact. By addressing key issues such as misogyny, toxic masculinity, and the absence of redemption, Rathee encourages viewers to critically evaluate the content they consume and its implications on broader societal values.