In today’s social media era, the line between private and public life has become increasingly blurred, with parenting being a prominent topic of online discussion. Trends showcasing unique or unconventional parenting approaches have gained widespread attention. While many have found support and inspiration from these stories, some use them to gain instant recognition by spreading misinformation.
A recent case involved a woman from Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh who went viral claiming she had 24 children over 23 years of marriage. This astonishing claim intrigued many, but the reality has now been revealed.
Unveiling the Truth
The woman in question, identified as Khushboo Pathak from Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, originally claimed she had given birth to 24 children throughout her 23-year marriage, with ages ranging from two to 18 years. She explained that her “children” included both twins and single births.
In her interviews, Pathak stated that 16 of her children were twins and mentioned that she stopped having children after the COVID-19 lockdown. Additionally, she hinted at a future ambition to enter politics.
Despite her claims, skepticism remained among many. People demanded proof, such as names on a ration card, and ridiculed her for how she presented her story on social media. Some even speculated about her personal life and extramarital affairs.
The Real Story Unveiled
Following widespread attention and scrutiny, News18 conducted an investigation into Pathak’s claims. The investigation revealed that Pathak is actually a mother of two. The other 22 “children” she referred to were, in reality, saplings she had planted and symbolically considered her “children.”
Further verification confirmed that her ration card only listed two children. In response to the exposure, Pathak admitted to misleading the public and apologized for her actions.
This incident highlights the ease with which false information can spread on social media and underscores the importance of verifying claims before accepting them as truth.
What are your thoughts on such misleading viral content? Is it a misguided attempt for attention, or simply a poor prank?
